Timeline for Transposable elements in phylogenetics
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7 at 5:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 9 at 3:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 10 at 2:06 | answer | added | M__♦ | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 7 at 17:23 | comment | added | terdon♦ | Thanks for the edit, that helps! But what is the question you are asking? Why do you want to build these trees, what do you hope they will tell you? If you are interested in the evolution of the gene itself, and given that you are comparing with quite distant species, I would ignore the LINE (and most probably the intron as well). If you are trying to see if you can pinpoint when this LINE was introduced, that's different. Alternatively, it might even make more sense to work at the protein level. Basically, the answer depends on the exact question you are trying to answer using your data. | |
| Jul 6 at 13:07 | history | edited | Opossum312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 432 characters in body
|
| Jul 6 at 9:24 | history | edited | Opossum312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| S Jul 6 at 9:08 | review | First questions | |||
| Jul 6 at 11:34 | |||||
| S Jul 6 at 9:08 | history | asked | Opossum312 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |