Timeline for How adding genomes to a kraken database can increase the number of minimizers associated with a leaf of the taxonomy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29 at 13:20 | comment | added | bli | To elaborate: If I had added genomes belonging to L. chagasi (for instance, at the S1 level), it would not have surprised me to see a larger number of k-mers associated to L. chagasi at the species level. New genomes should give a better idea of the diversity observable within a given clade. However, with genomes only added elsewhere, I don't get it. Maybe something to do with the distinction between k-mers and minimizers? | |
| Jul 28 at 2:31 | comment | added | M__♦ | I will look at this question over the next week. There's clearly a lot going on here. What I need to think about is "outside the clade" ... I'm not sure about that. | |
| Jul 27 at 21:05 | history | edited | bli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Try to make a better title
|
| Jul 26 at 22:11 | answer | added | gringer♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 26 at 14:56 | history | asked | bli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |