2
$\begingroup$

Sorry if this is a stupid question I am new to analysing targeted hybrid capture data.

I am analysing my HTS data from a targeted hybrid capture enrichment method and subsequent sequencing on a NextSeq.

Looking at my bam files, I see there are reads that are overlapping into my non target regions.

For example - my .bed file has two target regions in chr17:

enter image description here

However I still have reads overlapping between 7578739-7578918 (following example is position 7578850):

enter image description here

Quite a lot of these reads don't hit any part of the targeted regions in my bed file. Are these mistakes? How have they been pulled down for sequencing when they aren't in the target regions of the baits?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you asking why your pull down experiment was not 100.00000% perfect? You should read the literature or ask your co-workers who have done pulldowns before what % is typical for samples like yours. $\endgroup$
    – swbarnes2
    Commented Sep 23, 2020 at 18:13

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It strongly depends on exactly what your protocol is. Note that there are a good number of tools for QCing capture data (here, here).

Off-target reads are a standard observation in capture experiments; recall that it is target enrichment, not target perfect purification, as commenter swbarnes2 suggests.

The real question is whether the proportion of those off-target reads is too high for your application, or otherwise suggests problems. Those depend on details of the technique that you will likely have to figure out yourself.

Here are some tables from the first of those QC papers (supplement), showing on-target proportions for various capture samples (sorry, it would have been a bit of effort to get text of the tables rather than images):

enter image description here

enter image description here

These data suggest that on-target reads are 60%-80% of mapped reads. Note that they also lose a lot of reads in mapping, so we cannot exclude the possibility of mis-mapped garbage reads contributing to off-target mapping.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.