This page is claimed to contain a gold standard benchmark for viral genome assembly. https://github.com/cbg-ethz/5-virus-mix

The claim is here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411778/

"This data set was recently presented as a gold standard benchmark (Di Giallonardo et al. 2014)"

But at (Di Giallonardo et al. 2014) I can only find that mention:

"We previously estimated the frequencies of the virus strains in the 5-virus-mix by amplifying the protease gene using single-genome amplification (SGA), the current gold standard for studying diversity of virus populations".

That doesn't seem to mean precisely that the dataset is a gold standard benchmark for genome assembly but, as I understand, that SGA is a gold standard for something else.

My question is: is it? And who decided it is? Is still valid? Is there an official list of results somewhere for this benchmark set?

I tried to contact the owner of the page but still no answer.


Anyone can declare anything to be a "gold-standard", the term is meaningless. All if actually means is, "we think this is the test that everything else should be benchmarked against".


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.