Process A runs a python script which generates a CSV file in some absolute file path say "/mnt/x/blah.csv".
Process B needs to consume the CSV file line by line, after process A has finished.
The trouble is that the channel to input to B is initialized at the beginning before "/mnt/x/blah.csv" is created by A so it fails. This occurs even if I collect the result of process A as input to process B (because channel is initialized regardless)
nextflow.enable.dsl=2
def get_the_csv_records() {
Channel
.fromPath("/mnt/x/blah.csv")
.splitCsv(header:true, quote: '\"')
.map{ it.TheFieldIWant }
}
process process_a() {
output:
val("I'm done!")
'''
python.exe ./make_the_csv_file.py --path=/mnt/x/blah.csv
'''
}
process process_b() {
input:
val(previous_step_is_done_dummy_variable)
val(the_field)
'''
echo ${the_field}
'''
}
workflow do_a_then_b{
process_a()
process_b(process_a.out.collect(), get_the_csv_records())
}
This fails immediately with "No such file: /mnt/x/blah.csv" because the channel is initialized before process_a has even started.
Same behavior occurs when using concat:
process_b(process_a.out.collect().concat(get_the_csv_records()))
Question:
How can I make process_b() only read the input channel from the CSV file after it is created?
Alternatively, can I make process_b() trigger when process_a() is finished some other way?
Alternatively, can I add an intermediate step which reads process_a.out.collect(), then reads /mnt/x/blah.csv and outputs it into some existing channel which process_b() takes as input?
Another approach - what is the way to create a channel which outputs the results of splitCsv, when the file is not known at compile time?