4
$\begingroup$

Inspired by amateur variant hunters, I would like to join the Pango lineage proposal community and help contribute to variant surveillance.

However, I cannot seem to get access to GISAID, the platform that exclusively hosts a large share of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from around the world.

I applied/registered for an account back in summer 2022 (almost a year ago) using this form: https://gisaid.org/register/

But since then, nothing has happened. I have send an email and filled out the contact form on the website but never heard back.

I am very confused how GISAID can say they are a "public" database, while at the same time not giving accounts to people like me, not even responding to emails.

How does everyone else get access? Is there a secret email you need to contact? Or do you need to pay? I've read here which describes the founder of GISAID in detail.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I've got a GISAID account and it's subject to an approval process. It was pretty simple and is awarded quickly. There are definitely no fees needed. I personally didn't see the advantages over NCBI's really very impressive SARS-CoV-2 database system and thats what I'd recommend.

Their resource is here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/virus/vssi/#/virus?SeqType_s=Nucleotide&VirusLineage_ss=SARS-CoV-2,%20taxid:2697049&ids=MZ039713%20MZ039682%20OV522182%20

Its perfect for interrogation, it has the full spectrum of epidemiological metadata, and further details are in this post here:

How to programatically download SARS-CoV-2 fasta from NCBI/Genbank via API?

The Science journal page seemed a very good write up of GISAID BTW.


If you are wanting GISAID for networking, thats a bit tricky because NCBI is not going to do that. You can reapply for GISAID access, but at the time I was much more impressed by NCBI. The speed at which NCBI produced an awesome database was truly jaw-dropping and they'd implemented full pangolineages classification at an early stage. Thus I just use NCBI.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the edit @gringer, much appreciated. ".. it has all the data" is good interpretation of what I wrote, but my writing wasn't clear. Specifically, "it has all the epidemiological metadata" is what I intended to say. $\endgroup$
    – M__
    Commented May 19, 2023 at 21:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.