It seems there are two packages providing access to TCGA data these days:

Will GenomicDataCommons supersede TCGAbiolinks? Is there anything that I might miss if I decide to use only GenomicDataCommons?


There isn't a R/Bioconductor person or view, so there isn't a preferred way to access TCGA. Use what suits you.

Bioconductor is build by contributors which are encourage to not overlap in their contributions. Usually the packages have different options/features even if they allow to access to the same data.

In this case, the TCGAbiolinks package is specifically for TCGA dataset while GenomicDataCommons is for "access the NIH / NCI Genomic Data Commons RESTful service". So the functionality they bring to R and Bioconductor is different.

The fact that one project is finishing doesn't mean that the data or the packages build around that project are obsolete. Some functionality different between them is the functions to harmonize and prepare (GDCprepare) data from the TCGAbiolink package, or see a boxplot correlation and AAIC plot to define outliers TCGAanalyze_Preprocessing.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ I understand that there is not a R/BioC person, but it seems that the TCGA project is coming to a close in 2017. On the other hand the NCI GDC is just starting and will include/already includes the TCGA data, hence my question... Is it really true that they bring different functionality? Because it seems the GenomicDataCommons package will include the same (or more) of the TCGAbiolinks functionality. $\endgroup$ – rmagno Sep 19 '17 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ @plant See the updates in the answer $\endgroup$ – llrs Sep 20 '17 at 7:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.