The Albertsen lab has recently put out a competition/challenge for read error correction
I only found out about this today, and I think the conference where high-ranking participants were going to be mentioned has just finished, but the data is all public and there's no reason why this can't be continued in the future as a benchmarking test for nanopore base calling and/or read error correction.
Every [passed] read should be a 2D nanopore read with the following sequence structure, where the decamer, NNNNNNNNNN, is the unique molecular identifier and is attached to common primer sites at the read extremities:
<—- fragment of SSU cDNA molecule—->
So... what's the best consensus accuracy you can get from these reads? How did you get that accuracy?