I am maintaining a database of sequence files describing a collection of bacterial strains and plasmids that we have in our lab.
I am confronted to two sorts of issues:
- some sequence files contain errors
- other sequence files describe molecules that themselves contain variations (mutations, insertion or deletions) that occurred during the molecular cloning process.
I want to annotate the sequences to mark those errors and variations using the GenBank format. However, from the feature keys of the GenBank format described on the INSDC website, it is not clear to me which feature key should be used in each case.
To better explain my case, here below are what seems to me the most relevant feature keys, and my comment of the problem I have with them:
Feature key variation
Definition a related strain contains stable mutations from the same
gene (e.g., RFLPs, polymorphisms, etc.) which differ
from the presented sequence at this location (and
possibly others);
...
Comment used to describe alleles, RFLP's,and other naturally occurring
mutations and polymorphisms; variability arising as a result <<<
of genetic manipulation (e.g. site directed mutagenesis) should
be described with the misc_difference feature;
use /replace="" to annotate deletion, e.g.
variation 4..5
/replace=""
According to the line marked <<<
above, the feature key misc_difference
should be used...
Feature Key misc_difference
Definition feature sequence is different from that presented
in the entry and cannot be described by any other
difference key (old_sequence, variation, or modified_base);
...
Comment the misc_difference feature key should be used to
describe variability that arises as a result of
genetic manipulation (e.g. site directed mutagenesis);
use /replace="" to annotate deletion, e.g. <<<
misc_difference 412..433
/replace=""
But now, according to the example marked <<<
above, it means the variation (here a deletion) is NOT in the considered entry... So how to indicate variations (mutation, insertion, deletion, errors) that are actually present in an entry ?